RESUMO
En el año 2006 se inició en Cuba un proyecto dedicado a acelerar la formación doctoral en el campo de las Ciencias de la Información. El Programa Doctoral en Documentación e Información Científica, desarrollado por la Universidad de Granada, España, y la Universidad de La Habana, graduó durante diez años un total de 50 doctores cubanos y dos de países latinoamericanos. El proyecto perseguía la actualización y el fortalecimiento de la actividad investigativa en el país y el aumento de la publicación de artículos en revistas científicas de amplia visibilidad internacional. El presente artículo tuvo como objetivo determinar, desde un enfoque bibliométrico, la importancia que ha tenido este programa doctoral en los niveles de productividad científica nacional y en el posicionamiento del país a nivel regional y mundial en el campo de la Bibliotecología y las Ciencias de la Información. Se demostró la mejora del posicionamiento del país en las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus. Se identificó la proporción de estudios derivados del programa doctoral en el volumen total de la producción científica cubana sobre la especialidad generada durante el período 2006-2019. Un tercio de la producción científica nacional en ambas bases de datos fue generada por graduados de los tres grupos que conformaron el programa. De esta forma, Cuba ha podido ubicarse sostenidamente durante los últimos años entre los primeros 50 países del mundo y entre los cinco primeros países de Latinoamérica en la especialidad(AU)
The year 2006 saw the onset of a project aimed at speeding up information sciences doctoral training in Cuba. The Scientific Information and Documentation Doctoral Program, developed by the University of Granada, Spain, and the University of Havana, graduated a total 50 Cuban and two Latin American PhDs in ten years. The project was geared to updating and strengthening research activity in the country, as well as increasing the publication of papers in scientific journals of broad international visibility. The purpose of the present study was to determine with a bibliometric approach the impact of this doctoral program on national scientific productivity levels and the country's regional and worldwide ranking in the field of library and information sciences. The country's ranking was found to have improved in the databases Web of Science and Scopus. Identification was made of the proportion of studies stemming from the doctoral program with respect to the total volume of Cuban scientific production about the specialty in the period 2006-2019. One third of the national scientific production in both databases was generated by graduates from the three groups making up the program. Cuba has thus been able to occupy in recent years a sustained position among the first 50 countries worldwide and the first five Latin American countries in the specialty(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Publicações , Especialização , Bibliometria , Ciência da Informação , CubaRESUMO
Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo avaliar e sistematizar a produção acadêmica em Psicologia do Trabalho (PT) publicada em bases de dados brasileiras. A busca de artigos foi conduzida no Portal SciELO de janeiro a março de 2017, considerando os trabalhos publicados nos períodos de 2010 a 2016. Na seleção inicial, foram encontrados 4.248 artigos, dos quais 180 atenderam os critérios de inclusão. Foi estabelecida uma classificação temática, e os resultados evidenciaram uma prevalência de pesquisas em saúde mental do trabalhador, em detrimento de outras, tais como ergonomia e aposentadoria. A partir dessa revisão, foi possível identificar os principais temas que vêm sendo estudados pela área no país, bem como os que podem ser explorados, tanto na pesquisa quanto no campo de atuação do psicólogo organizacional e do trabalho.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate and systematize the academic production in Psychology of Work published in Brazilian databases. The search was carried out using the SciELO Portal, from January to March 2017, considering the papers published from 2010 to 2016. In the initial selection, 4,248 articles were found, of which 180 met the inclusion criteria. A thematic classification was established, and the results demonstrated a prevalence of research on the subject of worker mental health, at the expense of others, such as ergonomics and retirement. From this review, it was possible to identify the main themes that have been studied by this area in Brazil, as well as themes that can be explored, both in the research and in the practice of psychologists in the field of work and organizations.
Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo evaluar y sistematizar la producción académica en psicología del trabajo publicada en las bases de datos brasileñas. La búsqueda de los artículos se llevó a cabo en SciELO Portal, en el período de enero a marzo de 2017, considerando los trabajos publicados durante el período de 2010 a 2016. En la recopilación inicial se encontraron 4.248 artículos, de los cuales 180 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se estableció una clasificación temática y los resultados mostraron una prevalencia de la investigación en el área de la salud mental, en detrimento de otras, tales como la ergonomía y la jubilación. Esta revisión permitió identificar los principales temas que se han estudiado sobre el área en el país, así como aquellos que se pueden explorar, tanto en la investigación como en el campo de actuación del psicólogo organizacional y del trabajo.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: International scientific publication productivity is a tangible indicator for the accuracy of scientific policies. The quality of scientific publications is not increasing despite the fast increase in the publication count in Turkey. The international publication activities of Turkish anaesthesia clinics have not been previously explored. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the high quality scientific productivity of Turkish anesthesia clinics within the last 10 years. METHODS: We searched for studies conducted by anaesthesiologists in Turkey within the last 10 years and published in journals listed under the medical subject categories of anaesthesiology and critical care using 'Thomson Reuters InCites' and PubMed databases. We recorded publication year, subject, method, citation count and origin of each paper and conducted descriptive analyses. RESULTS: There were 630 papers meeting our inclusion criteria. Among those, 525 (83%) were studies on anaesthesia, 66 (10%) were studies on critical care and 39 (6%) were studies on pain. The average citation count was 9.90. There were 376 controlled/randomized controlled trials, 98 observational studies, 66 laboratory studies, 64 case series/reports, 5 reviews and 21 letters to the editor. Studies were conducted by universities (82.4%), by training and research hospitals (15.56%), by state and military hospitals (0.63%) and by physicians in private practice (1.27%). Baskent University had the highest publication count, Istanbul University had the highest citation count and Trakya University had the highest publication count per faculty teaching staff. CONCLUSION: The high-impact scientific productivity of Turkish anesthesia clinics is in a downward trend in the last 10 years, and the average citation count is lower than the global average.
